Skip to content

Study

Ging 2019 — Alphas, betas, and incels: masculinities of the manosphere

Men and Masculinities · 2019

Debbie Ging argues that a toxic strain of antifeminism has spread across online networks since Web 2.0, uniting diverse and often-feuding communities under Red Pill "philosophy" — a loose confederacy she calls the manosphere.

What the study found

Debbie Ging's article, first published online in May 2017, argues that a particularly toxic brand of antifeminism has spread across online networks in the Web 2.0 era, and that these diverse and often-feuding communities are broadly united by their adherence to Red Pill "philosophy" — a loose confederacy commonly known as the manosphere. [1]

a particularly toxic brand of antifeminism has become evident across online networks since Web 2.0
Ging, Men and Masculinities (2019)
[1]

Why it matters here

The paper is one of the foundational academic treatments of the manosphere, giving the label and its internal hierarchy — alphas, betas, incels — a scholarly framing rather than a purely journalistic one. On this site it is used to ground how the manosphere is defined and how its communities relate to one another. See how it informs the work of Debbie Ging, the researcher who advanced the concept, and how it frames Rollo Tomassi, a Red Pill author whose writing exemplifies the "philosophy" the article describes.

Sources

1 source · all archived at publication

  1. [1]Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere · Men and Masculinities archived ↗

By The Fieldnote Desk · How we verify · Corrections