Skip to content

Study

2019 — Digesting the red pill: masculinity and neoliberalism in the manosphere

Men and Masculinities · 2019

A content analysis of the roughly twenty-six documents r/TheRedPill required newcomers to read found the forum blends a coarse version of evolutionary psychology with neoclassical economics — casting women as "sellers" and men as "buyers of sex" — and argues this constructs women as exchangeable commodities.

What the study found

Shawn Van Valkenburgh's content analysis, first published in 2018 in Men and Masculinities, examined the roughly twenty-six documents that r/TheRedPill's moderators required newcomers to read. It found the forum integrates a coarse rendering of evolutionary psychology with neoclassical economics — positioning women as "sellers" and men as "buyers of sex" — and theorizes that the resulting philosophy constructs women as exchangeable commodities. [1]

constructs women as exchangeable commodities
Van Valkenburgh, 'Digesting the Red Pill', Men and Masculinities (2019)
[1]

Why it matters here

The paper offers a close reading of the specific texts that structure Red Pill thinking, showing how its arguments borrow the language of markets and mate value to describe relationships between men and women. On this site it is used to frame the writing of Rollo Tomassi, a Red Pill author whose work articulates the "sexual marketplace" logic the study analyses. The paper situates that logic within a broader neoliberal framing rather than treating it as a natural account of human behaviour.

Sources

1 source · all archived at publication

  1. [1]Digesting the Red Pill: Masculinity and Neoliberalism in the Manosphere · Men and Masculinities archived ↗

By The Fieldnote Desk · How we verify · Corrections