Study
Cheng, Tracy & Henrich 2021 — Dominance is necessary to explain human status hierarchies
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2021
A 2021 PNAS paper argued that dominance is a real and necessary component of how humans attain social status, and that status cannot be explained by prestige alone.
What the study found
This paper, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, argues that dominance — gaining influence through force, intimidation, or coercion — is a real and necessary component of how humans attain social status. On this account, status hierarchies cannot be fully explained by prestige alone, the freely conferred respect a person earns through valued skills or knowledge. Both routes to rank operate in human groups. [1]
Why it matters here
Manosphere discussion often reduces male social standing to a single "alpha" dominance ranking. This study is relevant because it treats dominance as one genuine pathway to status while insisting it sits alongside prestige rather than replacing it. That is a narrower and more conditional picture than a fixed hierarchy of dominant "alphas" over everyone else. See the check on whether alpha males exist for how this evidence is weighed against the popular framing.
Sources
1 source · all archived at publication
- [1]Dominance is necessary to explain human status hierarchies · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2021-06-01 archived ↗
By The Fieldnote Desk · How we verify · Corrections